It certainly moves like a train. i love the line
Trains are men and women
and its repetition throughout. There is something
mysterious and beautiful about this line that I can only
experience, but can find no words to describe. Understand,
the intention behind this critique is not to correct grammar,
punctuation, spelling, or usage. It is to walk-through the
poem in a more subjective sense in which I provide my understanding
as a reader, noting which parts I enjoy, which parts I find
confusing and why, criticizing mainly indirectly. I hope it
is helpful.
i.
Trains are men and women
holding hands and books
sleeping into each other like piled dogs
Whispering across voids:
ways to tend each other
ways of being there
Lost to the lonely watcher
under sounds of rail and bump
metal drone and solid wind.
This first section moves me quickly into a world that I can
understand. I see it all, though the lines are short, and
this is an excellent sign. I do not yet know why I am
listening, but there is a haunting tone of loneliness that seeps
into my stomach, settling down deep, intent on sticking around even
after I am finished reading. I can tell all of this even now,
before I have read further, and I move onward. I feel like
the action here takes place in a dream and that the speaker, who is
scrawling these thoughts and sketches into a notebook, is the
dream's creator, though perhaps he is not the dreamer...
ii.
On the train from Scotland, reading Larkin is a brand of
imitation.
Running my eyes over the passing horizons
like proofreading the moment of his creation
Dipping childish fingers in the greatness of that image:
men and women tying their lives into knots
a tangle for the untangling of years
I don't detect an obvious shift in scenery, though I strongly
suspect one. I am curious why Larkin is mentioned other than
the fact that the speaker is reading...I love the juxtaposition of
horizons and text, highly effective, makes me feel like I'm not
reading but surveying a landscape....the untangling of
years...hmm...intense.
I'm watching this line by line from somewhere far from
eyesight
As far as I know Larkin never took this train
The fields and villages seem emptied.
I'm handling his fire across an ocean of noise,
playing a very tricky tune with stuck
fingers
parading through the notes like a
drunk
with that invisible steam of persistence: a hopeless insistence of
becoming.
Still reading, but his mind is wandering, and mine is too,
pleased that Larkin speaks to someone, if not me, so that they can
call his writing fire, a matter of taste... then there's that
interesting little metaphor about the sticky fingers and their
tricky tune. but the last line sort of punctures the effect
of the whole thing and I'm snapped back into my own head, outside
of the poem looking in, wondering what happened and what that line
is supposed to mean. Reading it again, I see the meaning, but
it still doesn't seem interesting or relevant...and then I realize
that it was talking about Larkin all the time and I'm suddenly less
interested in the whole thing...however, please understand that
this remains subjective...objectively, I see the value in
discussing your actions at the time, reading Larkin, talk about
Larkin, makes sense.
It’s the way we mimic our parents
Papering their forms around the inside of our minds.
There’s a place in the basement for Dad’s Philly accent,
and Mom’s resigned sigh
A cardboard box of videos to live up to
Families to grow, and stories to write of our lives.
Trains are boys and girls chasing the heat of the setting sun.
and I'm back with all my attention and this is wonderful and
there are no words for this, but I understand again, although, what
this all had to do with Larkin...I don't know.
iii.
All aboard the Underground
cattle car packed tight
pumping blood through a city heart.
If you’ve ever been afraid of something
Ride the Underground
where your fears pack tight against you
pulling you toward something on the other side:
a tunnel, and at its end, a light.
A definitive scene shift and moving on to another train, not
looking back once, constant motion down the tracks of memory.
And I am agreeing with this idea of the Underground. I have
felt the same about it in my short experience with it. Mind
the gap and all that other rot, but it's a dismal necessary place,
and death is certainly near.
Even in King’s Cross, we’re doing our part
Ride the Underground
Find the meaning of your place in this city
The track will take you
Pulling you along
like the stale underground air rushing in before
the train
like the plastic bag tumbling along the rails in
its wake.
the plastic bag here is perhaps the most haunting, appropriate
image I've encountered in a long time. I'm totally grooving
to this whole stanza.
Up above decisions are made, hands are shaken
and here we are
boarding the train:
Piccadilly to Cockfosters and back again
the comings and goings of worldmakers
and here we are down below.
Ride the Underground.
YES! GO, MAN! GO!
The day black smoke hung over East London scared and excited
me.
Could it happen again?
The clammy grip of reality taking hold
If anything, it was an excuse for outrage
an outlet for underground angers and underground
sorrows.
From the top
it’s our infrastructure
From below
it’s the hatred at the end of the line
Somewhere in the middle
where the sunlight reaches its rubber white
fingers in
It’s the emptiness of lives lost:
this many fewer on the 9 o’clock rush
the still pictures on the news where the stocks
should be.
That day I girded for the struggle between their world and mine
Luckily it was just fire
to threaten the Games
unnerve the world again.
Fire to kiss our girders to concrete Earth again.
the ignorant American in me is saying, dammit, I remember
something about this on the news, but I have no idea what event
he's referencing. I love the imagery, but my inability to
connect this all with reality is irritating, so i read through
quickly.
Trains are men and women
huddled together on a wet Monday night.
There’s a master and slave in every relationship
The Underground--All Aboard--
is the city’s hidden phallus
fucking us all into city
life.
that is saying a lot and it's bordering on being trite in the
way that so many other Freudian-sounding metaphors are trite, but I
am willing to accept it because of the wonderful repetition here of
"Trains are men and women". I have no clue what the
master/slave bit is about.
iv.
In Paris trains beware
the words of a fuzzy pink hare
your hands will be sore
if they’re caught in the door
and I hear that it’s rude to stare.
at this point I become uneasy, wondering if the poem will go off
the rail. fuzzy pink hare? I don't remember that at all
in the Paris trains...the sing-songy meter is throwing me off a
little, but then there comes
The subway musicians lay claim
to a peculiar brand of fame
they don’t stay long
they play a quick song
and vanish as quick as they came.
and THAT is fantastic. I want maybe more detail, I feel
like I've barely left your head yet in the entire poem, an outing
would be just the thing at this point. Or maybe I'm just
biased because I'm a musician myself...
The Berlin Bahn brought me wheeling back to the place
my grandfather once was
armed and green to the teeth,
he spent his euro-trip hugging the ground
keeping an ear on the radio--I imagine--
waiting for the good news.
I like this, it's coming closer to the actual you that is the
speaker... The grandfather, I can only assume during the war.
cool.
In photos they were smiling:
one in particular shows him with his unit
poking their heads through the windows of a boxcar, waving.
The details are lost with the faces,
I make them up sometimes when I need to
it's taking them home, or someplace further
where I know the track never wanders.
I like the death reference at the end, very clever, but I don't
understand the part about "the details are lost with the
faces". The details of the faces? The details of the
events? maybe clarify. or did you just mean that you
don't know what happened to those men?
One story survived the war and came home to us
that my grandfather slashed the canvas of his cot
commissioned a German to paint on it
the smiling grace of a waiting bridesmaid.
He sent it to her drying--I can imagine the urgency--
and we have it now, still and straining,
an entire era hardened into the face of our roots.
that is a good story. though the wording is potentially
confusing. I get out of it that the grandpa commissioned a
German to paint the face of a waiting bridesmaid on a piece of
canvas, cut from his cot. Then he sent it to her, hurriedly,
presumably because he thought he might die or did die...oh, I guess
he couldn't have died, because otherwise you wouldn't be writing
this...or had he already had children at this point...oh wait no he
wasn't married...well that never stopped anyone...I seem to have
escalated my own confusion. Moving on.
Years later on the Bahn from Friedrichstraße to Schönefeld,
having dodged the fare, I scanned the cityscape for the origin of
that portrait
that would spawn a body to carry me there
along the tracks of my life.
In its absence I imagined a disembodied voice
telling me that trains are men and women
forever on foot, always tilting homeward.
good use of time markers to bring us back into the present, or
more recent past...you know what I mean. I enjoy the detail
of "having dodged he fare". I'm not sure if I believe the
disembodied voice, but this could also be a reference to the birth
of this poem in your own mind...if so that is a really interesting
concept that I'm totally digging right now... oh, and I just
noticed that I think this was supposed to be marked as section v.
and the rest may be off...unless you were trying to indicate that
this was also part of the same section with Paris...but it does
seem like its own section.
Rubbish of a god:
the hard hands that built these trains
and funeral fires.
Iron wind levels
the cold steel footing of the mind
when our trains get
wrecked.
The impact smacks of
a sweet kiss, and hands held tight
when our trains get
wrecked.
On a quiet night
two raccoons sort through rubbish
and two trains get
wrecked.
Ties and rail vibrate
that trains are men and women
stirring the good pot.
this seems very Eliot to me for some reason...there seems to be
a healthy respect for mystery here which I definitely
appreciate. I don't really have anything too constructive to
say about this section other
It certainly moves like a train. i love the line
and its repetition throughout. There is something mysterious and beautiful about this line that I can only experience, but can find no words to describe. Understand, the intention behind this critique is not to correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, or usage. It is to walk-through the poem in a more subjective sense in which I provide my understanding as a reader, noting which parts I enjoy, which parts I find confusing and why, criticizing mainly indirectly. I hope it is helpful.
This first section moves me quickly into a world that I can understand. I see it all, though the lines are short, and this is an excellent sign. I do not yet know why I am listening, but there is a haunting tone of loneliness that seeps into my stomach, settling down deep, intent on sticking around even after I am finished reading. I can tell all of this even now, before I have read further, and I move onward. I feel like the action here takes place in a dream and that the speaker, who is scrawling these thoughts and sketches into a notebook, is the dream's creator, though perhaps he is not the dreamer...
I don't detect an obvious shift in scenery, though I strongly suspect one. I am curious why Larkin is mentioned other than the fact that the speaker is reading...I love the juxtaposition of horizons and text, highly effective, makes me feel like I'm not reading but surveying a landscape....the untangling of years...hmm...intense.
Still reading, but his mind is wandering, and mine is too, pleased that Larkin speaks to someone, if not me, so that they can call his writing fire, a matter of taste... then there's that interesting little metaphor about the sticky fingers and their tricky tune. but the last line sort of punctures the effect of the whole thing and I'm snapped back into my own head, outside of the poem looking in, wondering what happened and what that line is supposed to mean. Reading it again, I see the meaning, but it still doesn't seem interesting or relevant...and then I realize that it was talking about Larkin all the time and I'm suddenly less interested in the whole thing...however, please understand that this remains subjective...objectively, I see the value in discussing your actions at the time, reading Larkin, talk about Larkin, makes sense.
and I'm back with all my attention and this is wonderful and there are no words for this, but I understand again, although, what this all had to do with Larkin...I don't know.
A definitive scene shift and moving on to another train, not looking back once, constant motion down the tracks of memory. And I am agreeing with this idea of the Underground. I have felt the same about it in my short experience with it. Mind the gap and all that other rot, but it's a dismal necessary place, and death is certainly near.
the plastic bag here is perhaps the most haunting, appropriate image I've encountered in a long time. I'm totally grooving to this whole stanza.
YES! GO, MAN! GO!
the ignorant American in me is saying, dammit, I remember something about this on the news, but I have no idea what event he's referencing. I love the imagery, but my inability to connect this all with reality is irritating, so i read through quickly.
that is saying a lot and it's bordering on being trite in the way that so many other Freudian-sounding metaphors are trite, but I am willing to accept it because of the wonderful repetition here of "Trains are men and women". I have no clue what the master/slave bit is about.
at this point I become uneasy, wondering if the poem will go off the rail. fuzzy pink hare? I don't remember that at all in the Paris trains...the sing-songy meter is throwing me off a little, but then there comes
and THAT is fantastic. I want maybe more detail, I feel like I've barely left your head yet in the entire poem, an outing would be just the thing at this point. Or maybe I'm just biased because I'm a musician myself...
I like this, it's coming closer to the actual you that is the speaker... The grandfather, I can only assume during the war. cool.
I like the death reference at the end, very clever, but I don't understand the part about "the details are lost with the faces". The details of the faces? The details of the events? maybe clarify. or did you just mean that you don't know what happened to those men?
that is a good story. though the wording is potentially confusing. I get out of it that the grandpa commissioned a German to paint the face of a waiting bridesmaid on a piece of canvas, cut from his cot. Then he sent it to her, hurriedly, presumably because he thought he might die or did die...oh, I guess he couldn't have died, because otherwise you wouldn't be writing this...or had he already had children at this point...oh wait no he wasn't married...well that never stopped anyone...I seem to have escalated my own confusion. Moving on.
good use of time markers to bring us back into the present, or more recent past...you know what I mean. I enjoy the detail of "having dodged he fare". I'm not sure if I believe the disembodied voice, but this could also be a reference to the birth of this poem in your own mind...if so that is a really interesting concept that I'm totally digging right now... oh, and I just noticed that I think this was supposed to be marked as section v. and the rest may be off...unless you were trying to indicate that this was also part of the same section with Paris...but it does seem like its own section.
this seems very Eliot to me for some reason...there seems to be a healthy respect for mystery here which I definitely appreciate. I don't really have anything too constructive to say about this section other