Thematically speaking, I'm a little sick of hearing a bunch of "The masses are ignorant sheep" things.  I mean, YES, it's true.  But I'm sick of hearing about it all the time.  Maybe you could cut a few of those out and try to get people to just feel what you're saying and agree to it of their own free will without you having to remind them how ignorant and media-controlled they are?

There was a very angry feel to the poem, although it was undermined a little by the end.  I love the first stanza, and wish the rest of the poem were more like it.

I think this poem might work better if it were a bit shorter.  You could cut out some of the stanzas and lines that seem a little extraneous, and give a lot more oomph to your (obviously angry) message.

In the first few stanzas, I was really feeling it, but then it started to drag a bit and by the end I felt a little "not with a bang but a whimper." 

This might have had something to do with the ellipses you use, as well.  Their use in this poem makes it seem like you're starting off angry and then just kind of saying "Eh, but whatever"

as an example:

People outside the box, afraid to speak
Revolution can’t happen without you...

gives a very "But hey, whatever." feel to the line.  A period would make it much sharper.

They do work sometimes, like this line:

New wars wage subtle, unspoken, alone...

It may just be the word choice, but the ... in this case implies that you should keep thinking about this as you go on through the poem.  I'm not sure how a war is alone, unspoken or subtle, but I still really like this line.

Fire let loose my breath and spoke dreams to me

This is a beautiful bit of imagery, and possibly my favourite line in the poem.

In this line it seems like you were putting a word on the end of a line just to put it on the end of a line, when it'd work better at the start of the following one.

 

Thoughts unspoken are demanding. People,
Time is ticking, we need revolution.

Some of the wording is a bit weird.  This may be intentional, or it may be just the first-draft-itude of the poem.

Sometimes out of war comes something so new-
Ideas can’t die, like a first kiss it’s fresh.

If nothing else, "Ideas" is plural, so "it's" should be "they're".  In general, though, I think that line could do with some work.

This sort of inversion pops up in a few places, and is very distracting.

Die safe and old? What in life did you feel?

The second question there is an example.

Lines that I really liked:

Hands were meant to write, unite, get driven

Fire let loose my breath and spoke dreams to me

Although like others, I am a bit weary on the subject, I was surprised at how well I ended up liking this. Though I still thought your theme, or rather the power of your theme, could've used some work.

Hm. From when I first read this, I've given it a bit of thought to try and understand what I really think of it more clearly. At first I wasn't certain what bothered me about it specifically, but now I'm able to specify. Of course your theme carries a particularly strong and evident message, but one thing that I did not entirely get was why, near the end of the poem, you seemed to back off a little from the message. As if you were gradually cowering a bit near the end, and the message was growing weaker. Almost in a panicking way. If anything, having a stanza like this:

 ...could also give off a hypocritical vibe, which will essentially not leave the reader inspired or empowered or with any type of sparking emotion (assuming that was the kind you were reaching for), but instead thinking of you as, yet again, another part of the angered-but-still-working-on-fixing-things sheep.

For example, the two emboldened parts I highlighted above got me thinking, and a bit confused. Maybe it's something I still have to fully digest, but why would you accuse your readers of being prisoners of indifference, saying that they've tried to avoid and escape it, when you yourself have confessed "to have tried to kill yourself"? Even if it's meant to be reassuring, this doesn't leave the reader that inspired, provoked, etc. Just left with the feeling of still being in another hopeless lost cause. That if even the strongest leaders and accusers have broken down, what good would they be? Unless that part was meant to be in subtle sarcasm, or your theme had to actually do with the accusing people being hypocrites themselves, this could otherwise render the poem a bit confusing in that aspect.

Like I said, I could see how it would work in the assurance way, in how you're saying "I know this is tough. Trust me. I myself have been through very hard times, but I've come to realize that we have to face this. We can still have peace". But as we all take things in differently, others may not see that as readily, just as uninspiring hypocrisy.

Of course it's not as personal as I'm making it sound now, but we're speaking in terms of a reader/author relationship. I thought the beginning and middle of the poem was very good, and it kept me wanting to read more... but the ending just didn't have that something to make the whole thing really stick. The picture of an angry man standing up admist a crowd to prove a point, but quietly sitting back down when he's finished and going back to drinking his coffee comes to mind. The reason why I'm pointing this one detail out is because it can really have a considerable effect on the mood of your poem, the look of it, and what your reader takes away from it - and obviously that's one of the most important things you can have.

Mainly, I liked this. I think with some improvements to the power of your theme/message, it could be better. Remember, exceptions discarded, if you have a strong message in your poem, go forward with it. Don't let them see you waver